Slide # 1

Tuesday, February 25, 2014

For Europe's Economy, A Ray Of Light

The European Commission released Tuesday its latest regional economic GDPO forecast, lauding continued economic recovery for the region. The executive body of the European Union sees GDP growth at 1.5 percent for the 28 members of the EU and 1.2 percent for the 18 members of the euro currency bloc. Growth is expected to accelerate from these modest figures, to 2 percent for the EU and 1.8 percent for the euro zone, on expected growth in domestic consumer demand and a rebound in export growth.
For Europe's Economy, A Ray Of LightFor Europe's Economy, A Ray Of Light
© Reuters. German Chancellor Angela Merkel making a point at an economic meeting.
© IBTimes. Sweden, Denmark and Germany appear to be reducing their debt-to-GDP ratio as are Portugal, Ireland and Greece. Spain, the U.K., France and Italy are growing their ratio of debt to the economic output needed to manage borrowing.
“The worst of the crisis may now be behind us,” said Olli Rehn, commission vice president for economic and monetary affairs and the Euro, in a statement announcing the projected forecasts, which have increased slightly from the autumn 2013 estimates, suggesting that the situation has improved in recent months in the view of the commission.
Europe’s largest economies, Germany, the U.K., France, Italy and Spain are all expected to grow this year, albeit nowhere near pre-crash levels. Germany and the U.K. could top 2 percent growth by the end of next year.
But the ratio of debt to GDP will continue to rise for major European economies, which means that highly unpopular austerity measures to reduce spending will continue for the foreseeable future as many of Europe’s major economic powers are still increasing how much they’re borrowing compared to how much revenue they generate from productivity to pay back these public loans. Spain and France could see the ratio toping 100 percent by the end of next year while economic austerity in Portugal, Ireland and Greece, which have the highest debt-to-GDP ratios, will begin to see declines.
The higher the debt-to-GDP ratio, the harder it is for countries to pay back loans or to acquire further lines of credit – and the higher the ratio the more costly it is to borrow. The larger a country’s economy, the more debt it can handle and the cheaper it is to borrow money. When economies are huge and stable, they can handle higher debt loads than less stable and less productive economies. That’s why, for example, Japan can have the world’s highest debt ratio among developed economies, at over 200 percent, while Sudan, an underdeveloped economy that has a lower debt ratio than Japan, is in a more economically precarious position despite a debt ratio of under 100 percent. When it comes to debt, the size of the economy matters. However, there is debate about how high the debt ratio of an economy can go before it caps growth.
© St. Louis Fed. The U.S. debt to GDP ratio has increased from 67 percent amid the last economic recession (shown here in gray) to over 100 percent at the start of last year. The ratio declined slightly last year.
The United States debt-to-GDP ratio stood at 99 percent as of the third quarter of 2013 (it topped 100 percent early last year), according to the latest figures from the St. Louis Fed. In 2008 that ratio was 67 percent, showing just how much the national debt has risen in recent years

US Manufacturing Group: Reports Of The Sector's Death Are Greatly Exaggerated

Manufacturing is the lifeblood of the global economy and indeed making a comeback, but there is a lot the U.S. should do to propel the industry forward, Jay Timmons, president of the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), said Tuesday during a State of Manufacturing address.
US Manufacturing Group: Reports Of The Sector's Death Are Greatly ExaggeratedUS Manufacturing Group: Reports Of The Sector's Death Are Greatly Exaggerated
“We’re definitely making solid progress,” he said. “But there are challenges ahead.”
Those challenges include the highest corporate taxes in the world, a shortage of trade agreements, a gap in science, technology, engineering and math skills, enforcing intellectual property rights, compliance costs and regulatory confusion, demands of the Affordable Care Act and a lack of long-term perspective among policymakers, Timmons said at the luncheon hosted by the Greater Houston Partnership, a business and economic development organization that has made helping the manufacturing industry grow its primary issue for 2014.
© Reuters. A manufacturing plant in the United States
“Government overreach poses the biggest threat to us,” Timmons said. NAM is the largest industrial trade group in the U.S. and lobbies Congress to adopt its favored policies.
This year, Timmons would like to see lower taxes and more trade agreements, like Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper has accomplished for Canada and attracted some American companies like Microsoft to move some offices across the border.
But for all the challenges, Timmons is optimistic that the more than one million Americans working in manufacturing can continue to regrow the industry from its dive during the recession. He applauded young people for choosing manufacturing jobs and the military for providing the necessary skills to its members. NAM has been working with General Electric Company (NYSE:GE) and veterans to find them manufacturing positions that match their skills.
GE’s CEO Jeff Immelt is also optimistic. When asked Monday at the Bloomberg Energy 2020 conference what he was most excited about, he said the reinvention of manufacturing.
“People think it’s slowing,” Immelt said. “That’s wrong. Manufacturing is being digitized, democratized, and the science is awesome, I mean, really awesome.”
Since 2009, the manufacturing sector has grown 18 percent. Last year, manufacturing contributed $1 trillion to the economy and supported 11.3 million jobs. Manufacturing Alliance forecasts that the industry will grow by 300,000 jobs a year if manufacturing rises from 12 percent to 15 percent of the economy.
“That’s not all that hard to imagine because that’s exactly where we were last decade,” Timmons said.
He credits innovation, like the industrial and energy efficient fans from Kentucky-based Big Ass Fans, and cheaper energy through natural gas for the growth in manufacturing.
“The shale revolution is big, and you all certainly here in Texas understand that already but more Americans need to understand how the shale revolution is going to transform everything that we do in this country,” he said. “It will give us a long term comeback in the manufacturing industry. That is, unless Washington gets in the way.”

Natural gas futures extend losses ahead of contract expiration

Investing.com - Natural gas futures fell sharply on Tuesday, extending heavy losses from the previous session as forecasts for milder U.S. weather weighed ahead of the expiration of the front-month contract.
Natural gas futures extend losses ahead of contract expirationNatural gas futures tumble again ahead of March contract expiration
On the New York Mercantile Exchange, natural gas futures for delivery in March fell to a session low of $5.000 per million British thermal units. Nymex March gas prices last traded at $5.093 per million British thermal units during U.S. morning hours, down 6.45%.
The March contract rallied to $6.493 per million British thermal units on Monday, the most since December 2008, before plummeting 11.25% to settle at $5.445.
The March contract is due to expire at the end of Wednesday’s trading session. Contract expiration often leads to volatile sessions as market participants look to close out positions or reposition their portfolios.
Meanwhile, the more actively traded April contact shed 0.45% to trade at $4.600 per million British thermal units.
Natural gas futures were likely to find support at $4.564 per million British thermal units, the low from February 10 and resistance at $6.493, the high from February 24.
Natural gas prices tumbled after updated weather-forecasting models called for a return of milder temperatures across the eastern U.S. as a blast of cold artic air moves out of the region.
The U.S. National Weather Service said Monday that higher temperatures than previously forecast were expected in the Midwest from March 6 to March 10.
Nymex natural gas prices rallied 15% last week, the second consecutive weekly gain, as frigid winter temperatures in the U.S. led households to burn a higher than normal amount of the fuel in furnaces to heat their homes.
Total U.S. natural gas storage stood at 1.443 trillion cubic feet as of last week, the lowest for this time of year since 2004.
The heating season from November through March is the peak demand period for U.S. gas consumption. Approximately 52% of U.S. households use natural gas for heating, according to the Energy Department.
Elsewhere on the Nymex, light sweet crude oil futures for delivery in April fell 1.1% to trade at $101.67 a barrel, while heating oil for April delivery shed 0.25% to trade at $3.042 per gallon

Gold turns higher after disappointing U.S. consumer confidence data

Investing.com - Gold prices turned modestly higher on Tuesday, after data showed that U.S. consumer confidence fell unexpectedly in February.
Gold turns higher after disappointing U.S. consumer confidence dataGold prices erase losses after disappointing U.S. consumer confidence data
On the Comex division of the New York Mercantile Exchange, gold futures for April delivery traded in a range between $1,331.60 a troy ounce and $1,339.90 an ounce.
Gold prices last traded at $1,339.40 an ounce during U.S. morning hours, 0.1% higher.
Futures rallied to $1,339.20 an ounce on Monday, the most since October 31, before trimming gains to settle at $1,338.00 an ounce, up 1.09%, or $14.40.
Prices were likely to find support at $1,307.10 a troy ounce, the low from February 20 and near-term resistance at $1,341.90, the high from October 31.
Meanwhile, silver for May delivery held in a range between $21.71 a troy ounce and $22.05 an ounce. Prices last traded at $21.97 an ounce, down 0.55%.
The March contract rallied to $22.21 an ounce on Monday, the highest since October 31, before paring gains to end at $22.08 an ounce, up 1.26%.
Silver futures were likely to find support at $21.55 a troy ounce, the low from February 24 and resistance at $22.21, the high from February 24.
The Conference Board, a market research group said its index of consumer confidence declined to 78.1 this month from a downwardly revised reading of 79.4 in January. Analysts had expected the index to inch up to 80.0 in February.
The decline was driven by the Expectations Index, which dropped to 75.7 from 80.8.
The disappointing data added to expectations that U.S. monetary policy will remain accommodative.
Gold and silver prices have been well-supported in recent weeks amid concerns that the U.S. economic recovery has lost momentum since the end of last year as inclement winter weather weighed on growth.
Gold has gained nearly 8.5% since the beginning of the year, while silver has picked up approximately 8%.
Elsewhere on the Comex, copper futures for May delivery dropped 0.9% to trade at $3.211 a pound.

Bitcoin falls more than 10% as Mt. Gox vanishes

Investing.com - Bitcoin prices lost more than 10% on Tuesday, as one of its leading major exchanges, Mt. Gox, went offline amid fears that it is on the verge of bankruptcy.
Bitcoin falls more than 10% as Mt. Gox vanishesBitcoin prices tumble as Mt. Gox disappears
According to the CoinDesk Bitcoin Price Index, which averages prices from the major exchanges, prices of the crypto-currency declined 11.1% to trade at $485.15.
The price of a Bitcoin last traded at $491.00 on Slovenia-based BitStamp, down 7.9%, while prices on BTC-e dropped 10% to trade at $496.90.
BitStamp is now the world’s largest Bitcoin exchange, while Bulgaria-based BTC-e is the second-biggest by volume.
Sentiment was dealt a severe blow after the website of the Tokyo-based Mt. Gox Bitcoin Exchange went blank on Tuesday, in the latest development to roil the virtual currency market.
The website of the troubled exchange has been offline since at least 10:30 p.m. Eastern time on Monday. Mt. Gox has yet to issue any statement about reasons behind the site going offline and whether it would be back at any time.
A report from the Wall Street Journal said the website appeared to have been deleted, as accessing the site yielded an answer from the its servers but displayed nothing.
The news comes amid rumors that the exchange had become "insolvent" after losing 744,408 Bitcoins, worth around $350 million at current prices, due to a years-long hacking effort that went unnoticed by the company.
Mt. Gox’s troubles started on February 7, when it was forced to halt all Bitcoin withdrawals, citing technical issues.
Prices on Mt. Gox plunged to $91.50 on February 21 as investors were disappointed with a lack of concrete details regarding progress made on resuming withdrawals on the struggling exchange.
Mark Karpeles, chief executive officer of Mt. Gox, resigned on Sunday from the board of the Bitcoin Foundation. The exchange was a founding member and one of three elected industry representatives on the board of the Bitcoin Foundation.
Mt. Gox was once the world's largest Bitcoin trading exchange, with volume topping 1 million trades a day at its peak.
Meanwhile, six other major Bitcoin exchanges, including Bitstamp, BTC China and Kraken, issued a joint statement distancing themselves from Mt. Gox.
"This tragic violation of the trust of users of Mt. Gox was the result of one company's actions and does not reflect the resilience or value of Bitcoin and the digital currency industry," the exchanges, including Coinbase, Circle Internet Financia and Blockchain.info, said in a statement.
"As with any new industry, there are certain bad actors that need to be weeded out, and that is what we are seeing today,” the statement continued.
"We are confident, however, that strong Bitcoin companies, led by highly competent teams and backed by credible investors, will continue to thrive, and to fulfill the promise that Bitcoin offers as the future of payment in the internet age," they added.
Bitcoin is digital cash for the internet and it is not backed by a government or central bank to regulate or issue it. It can be used to purchase goods and services from stores and online retailers

The History of the Forex

The History of the Forex Gold Standard System The creation of the gold standard monetary system in 1875 marks one of the most important events in the history of the forex market. Before the gold standard was implemented, countries would commonly use gold and silver as means of international payment. The main issue with using gold and silver for payment is that their value is affected by external supply and demand. For example, the discovery of a new gold mine would drive gold prices down.

The underlying idea behind the gold standard was that governments guaranteed the conversion of currency into a specific amount of gold, and vice versa. In other words, a currency would be backed by gold. Obviously, governments needed a fairly substantial gold reserve in order to meet the demand for currency exchanges. During the late nineteenth century, all of the major economic countries had defined an amount of currency to an ounce of gold. Over time, the difference in price of an ounce of gold between two currencies became the exchange rate for those two currencies. This represented the first standardized means of currency exchange in history.

The gold standard eventually broke down during the beginning of World War I. Due to the political tension with Germany, the major European powers felt a need to complete large military projects. The financial burden of these projects was so substantial that there was not enough gold at the time to exchange for all the excess currency that the governments were printing off.

Although the gold standard would make a small comeback during the inter-war years, most countries had dropped it again by the onset of World War II. However, gold never ceased being the ultimate form of monetary value. (For more on this, read The Gold Standard Revisited, What Is Wrong With Gold? and Using Technical Analysis In The Gold Markets.)

Bretton Woods System Before the end of World War II, the Allied nations believed that there would be a need to set up a monetary system in order to fill the void that was left behind when the gold standard system was abandoned. In July 1944, more than 700 representatives from the Allies convened at Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, to deliberate over what would be called the Bretton Woods system of international monetary management.

To simplify, Bretton Woods led to the formation of the following:
  1. A method of fixed exchange rates;
  2. The U.S. dollar replacing the gold standard to become a primary reserve currency; and
  3. The creation of three international agencies to oversee economic activity: the International Monetary Fund (IMF), International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT).
One of the main features of Bretton Woods is that the U.S. dollar replaced gold as the main standard of convertibility for the world's currencies; and furthermore, the U.S. dollar became the only currency that would be backed by gold. (This turned out to be the primary reason that Bretton Woods eventually failed.)

Over the next 25 or so years, the U.S. had to run a series of balance of payment deficits in order to be the world's reserved currency. By the early 1970s, U.S. gold reserves were so depleted that the U.S. treasury did not have enough gold to cover all the U.S. dollars that foreign central banks had in reserve.

Finally, on August 15, 1971, U.S. President Richard Nixon closed the gold window, and the U.S. announced to the world that it would no longer exchange gold for the U.S. dollars that were held in foreign reserves. This event marked the end of Bretton Woods.

Even though Bretton Woods didn't last, it left an important legacy that still has a significant effect on today's international economic climate. This legacy exists in the form of the three international agencies created in the 1940s: the IMF, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (now part of the World Bank) and GATT, the precursor to the World Trade Organization. (To learn more about Bretton Wood, read What Is The International Monetary Fund? and Floating And Fixed Exchange Rates.)

Current Exchange RatesAfter the Bretton Woods system broke down, the world finally accepted the use of floating foreign exchange rates during the Jamaica agreement of 1976. This meant that the use of the gold standard would be permanently abolished. However, this is not to say that governments adopted a pure free-floating exchange rate system. Most governments employ one of the following three exchange rate systems that are still used today:

  1. Dollarization;
  2. Pegged rate; and
  3. Managed floating rate.
Dollarization This event occurs when a country decides not to issue its own currency and adopts a foreign currency as its national currency. Although dollarization usually enables a country to be seen as a more stable place for investment, the drawback is that the country's central bank can no longer print money or make any sort of monetary policy. An example of dollarization is El Salvador's use of the U.S. dollar. (To read more, see Dollarization Explained.)

Pegged Rates Pegging occurs when one country directly fixes its exchange rate to a foreign currency so that the country will have somewhat more stability than a normal float. More specifically, pegging allows a country's currency to be exchanged at a fixed rate with a single or a specific basket of foreign currencies. The currency will only fluctuate when the pegged currencies change.

For example, China pegged its yuan to the U.S. dollar at a rate of 8.28 yuan to US$1, between 1997 and July 21, 2005. The downside to pegging would be that a currency's value is at the mercy of the pegged currency's economic situation. For example, if the U.S. dollar appreciates substantially against all other currencies, the yuan would also appreciate, which may not be what the Chinese central bank wants.

Managed Floating Rates This type of system is created when a currency's exchange rate is allowed to freely change in value subject to the market forces of supply and demand. However, the government or central bank may intervene to stabilize extreme fluctuations in exchange rates. For example, if a country's currency is depreciating far beyond an acceptable level, the government can raise short-term interest rates. Raising rates should cause the currency to appreciate slightly; but understand that this is a very simplified example. Central banks typically employ a number of tools to manage currency.

Market Participants Unlike the equity market - where investors often only trade with institutional investors (such as mutual funds) or other individual investors - there are additional participants that trade on the forex market for entirely different reasons than those on the equity market. Therefore, it is important to identify and understand the functions and motivations of the main players of the forex market.

Governments and Central Banks Arguably, some of the most influential participants involved with currency exchange are the central banks and federal governments. In most countries, the central bank is an extension of the government and conducts its policy in tandem with the government. However, some governments feel that a more independent central bank would be more effective in balancing the goals of curbing inflation and keeping interest rates low, which tends to increase economic growth. Regardless of the degree of independence that a central bank possesses, government representatives typically have regular consultations with central bank representatives to discuss monetary policy. Thus, central banks and governments are usually on the same page when it comes to monetary policy.

Central banks are often involved in manipulating reserve volumes in order to meet certain economic goals. For example, ever since pegging its currency (the yuan) to the U.S. dollar, China has been buying up millions of dollars worth of U.S. treasury bills in order to keep the yuan at its target exchange rate. Central banks use the foreign exchange market to adjust their reserve volumes. With extremely deep pockets, they yield significant influence on the currency markets.

Banks and Other Financial Institutions In addition to central banks and governments, some of the largest participants involved with forex transactions are banks. Most individuals who need foreign currency for small-scale transactions deal with neighborhood banks. However, individual transactions pale in comparison to the volumes that are traded in the interbank market.

The interbank market is the market through which large banks transact with each other and determine the currency price that individual traders see on their trading platforms. These banks transact with each other on electronic brokering systems that are based upon credit. Only banks that have credit relationships with each other can engage in transactions. The larger the bank, the more credit relationships it has and the better the pricing it can access for its customers. The smaller the bank, the less credit relationships it has and the lower the priority it has on the pricing scale.

Banks, in general, act as dealers in the sense that they are willing to buy/sell a currency at the bid/ask price. One way that banks make money on the forex market is by exchanging currency at a premium to the price they paid to obtain it. Since the forex market is a decentralized market, it is common to see different banks with slightly different exchange rates for the same currency.

Hedgers Some of the biggest clients of these banks are businesses that deal with international transactions. Whether a business is selling to an international client or buying from an international supplier, it will need to deal with the volatility of fluctuating currencies.

If there is one thing that management (and shareholders) detest, it is uncertainty. Having to deal with foreign-exchange risk is a big problem for many multinationals. For example, suppose that a German company orders some equipment from a Japanese manufacturer to be paid in yen one year from now. Since the exchange rate can fluctuate wildly over an entire year, the German company has no way of knowing whether it will end up paying more euros at the time of delivery.

One choice that a business can make to reduce the uncertainty of foreign-exchange risk is to go into the spot market and make an immediate transaction for the foreign currency that they need.

Unfortunately, businesses may not have enough cash on hand to make spot transactions or may not want to hold massive amounts of foreign currency for long periods of time. Therefore, businesses quite frequently employ hedging strategies in order to lock in a specific exchange rate for the future or to remove all sources of exchange-rate risk for that transaction.

For example, if a European company wants to import steel from the U.S., it would have to pay in U.S. dollars. If the price of the euro falls against the dollar before payment is made, the European company will realize a financial loss. As such, it could enter into a contract that locked in the current exchange rate to eliminate the risk of dealing in U.S. dollars. These contracts could be either forwards or futures contracts.



Speculators Another class of market participants involved with foreign exchange-related transactions is speculators. Rather than hedging against movement in exchange rates or exchanging currency to fund international transactions, speculators attempt to make money by taking advantage of fluctuating exchange-rate levels.

The most famous of all currency speculators is probably George Soros. The billionaire hedge fund manager is most famous for speculating on the decline of the British pound, a move that earned $1.1 billion in less than a month. On the other hand, Nick Leeson, a derivatives trader with England's Barings Bank, took speculative positions on futures contracts in yen that resulted in losses amounting to more than $1.4 billion, which led to the collapse of the company.

Some of the largest and most controversial speculators on the forex market are hedge funds, which are essentially unregulated funds that employ unconventional investment strategies in order to reap large returns. Think of them as mutual funds on steroids. Hedge funds are the favorite whipping boys of many a central banker. Given that they can place such massive bets, they can have a major effect on a country's currency and economy. Some critics blamed hedge funds for the Asian currency crisis of the late 1990s, but others have pointed out that the real problem was the ineptness of Asian central bankers. (For more on hedge funds, see Introduction To Hedge Funds - Part One and Part Two.)Either way, speculators can have a big sway on the currency markets, particularly big ones.

Now that you have a basic understanding of the forex market, its participants and its history, we can move on to some of the more advanced concepts that will bring you closer to being able to trade within this massive market. The next section will look at the main economic theories that underlie the forex market.

KARL BENZ

Karl Benz was born on 25th November 1844 in Karlsruhe, the son of an engine driver. The middle of the last century, when Benz was an apprentice, was a time of widespread fascination with the "new technology". The first railway line in Germany from Nuremberg to Furth had been opened in 1835, only twenty years before, and in the space of just a few decades the railways, steamships and new production processes had ushered in a new era in technology, industry and everyday life. Karl Benz attended the Karlsruhe grammar school and subsequently the Karlsruhe Polytechnic. Between 1864 and 1870, he worked for a number of different firms as a draughtsman, designer and works manager before founding his first firm in 1871 in Mannheim, with August Ritter. But little money was to be made in the building materials trade and the economic convulsions of the 1870's caused difficulties for the young company. Karl Benz now turned to the two-stroke engine, in the hope of finding a new livelihood. After two years' work, his first engine finally sprang to life on New Year's Eve, 1879. He took out various patents on this machine.
Equally important were the contacts with new business associates, with whose assistance Benz founded a gas engine factory in Mannheim. But after only a short time he withdrew from this company since it did not give him a free enough hand for his technical experiments. Benz found two new partners and with them founded "Benz & Co., Rheinische Gasmotorenfabrik" in 1883 in Mannheim, a general partnership. Business was good and soon the production of industrial engines was being stepped up

With this new financial security, Karl Benz could now set about designing a "motor carriage", with an engine based on the Otto four stroke cycle. Unlike Daimler, who installed his engine in an ordinary carriage, Benz designed not only his engine, but the whole vehicle as well. On 29th January 1886, he was granted a patent on it and on 3rd July 1886, he introduced the first automobile in the world to an astonished public. In 1903, Karl Benz retired from active participation in his company. The next year however, he joined the supervisory board of Benz & Cie and he was a member of the supervisory board of Daimler-Benz AG from 1926, when the company was formed, until his death in 1929. In 1872, Karl Benz married Bertha Ringer, who was to be of major support to him in his work. The couple produced five children. Benz lived to witness the motoring boom and the definitive penetration of his idea in to everyday life. He died on 4th April 1929. The former Benz family residence in Ladenburg is now open to the public. The Daimler-Benz foundation, founded in 1986, has its registered office here.